JoshiFans Forum

General Category => Non-Joshi Talk => Topic started by: 孤星 on March 21, 2009, 03:33:32 AM

Title: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on March 21, 2009, 03:33:32 AM
What's the most ridiculous thing you've ever encountered on a message board/forum? It could be another poster, a thought or a question. ..I'll get the ball rolling. ..

Someone just commented that one reason for men not wanting to see women wrestlers on the card is homosexuality in those men.  *give

That is total fail.

Poster A: I remember seeing a topic on the RoH boards a while ago (to which I was referring and you would have got the jist if you actually read my post) which was several pages long of people bashing the female matches and how they didn't want to see them in RoH cards.

Pissant B then replied: Did you participate in said topic? Why bring it up? Some sexist or homosexual men with irrelevant opinions collaborating in one thread doesn't mean anything. The KKK has several chapters too. The Olympics have men and women competing in all the same sports and there's no debate about it.
   

WTF?  *haha
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on July 14, 2010, 05:17:33 PM
(http://208.106.250.72/_media/imgs/articles2/a97000_g001_12-no-topless.jpg)

(http://208.106.250.72/_media/imgs/articles2/a97085_c8.jpg)

(http://208.106.250.72/_media/imgs/articles2/a97085_c10.jpg)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on July 14, 2010, 06:19:02 PM
After seeing a clip of Ai Fujita doing her rarely seen Phoenix Splash on Youtube, someone commented by saying,

"that's not that good, kelly kelly can do a hurricanrana and scream like she's being raped"





 *kori
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on July 14, 2010, 10:39:59 PM
(http://208.106.250.72/_media/imgs/articles2/a96992_a611_9-wrestling.jpg)
oh gee ... what went wrong?
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: UnstableProtagonist on July 14, 2010, 10:45:18 PM
An anonymous spectator from the Tube left this comment on the Kana video I uploaded back at March:

"kana sucks.
Shes one of the worst joshi wrestlers, if you can even call her a wrestler. She just flails around like an idiot, no control, no class, no style. Thinks shes tough but wont go do real fighting like shoot boxing or mma. Go away Kana, leave wrestling to the wrestlers.
Lonely fans only like her for two reasons."

*imitates Stinkmeaner from the Boondocks screaming "B.A.N.!!"*  *fu

Also, WTF is THIS fool on?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdz3KXA-FLA
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on July 15, 2010, 02:44:42 PM
OH MY EYES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Necromancy, eh? These are great posts. I'm continually loosing faith in humanity.

After seeing a clip of Ai Fujita doing her rarely seen Phoenix Splash on Youtube, someone commented by saying,

"that's not that good, kelly kelly can do a hurricanrana and scream like she's being raped"





 *kori

Wow. Heartbreaking comments from Divas fans.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on July 15, 2010, 04:03:55 PM
An anonymous spectator from the Tube left this comment on the Kana video I uploaded back at March:

"kana sucks.
Shes one of the worst joshi wrestlers, if you can even call her a wrestler. She just flails around like an idiot, no control, no class, no style. Thinks shes tough but wont go do real fighting like shoot boxing or mma. Go away Kana, leave wrestling to the wrestlers.
Lonely fans only like her for two reasons."

*imitates Stinkmeaner from the Boondocks screaming "B.A.N.!!"*  *fu

Also, WTF is THIS fool on?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdz3KXA-FLA

what the crack is that person smoking?
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: The Juhoker on July 15, 2010, 11:17:39 PM
I've seen plenty of stupidity on the Wrestlecrap forums. One of the mods there actually suspended a person's account for 2 days just because said person told him that his jokes were lame. Another instance was a female mod who locked a topic and banned the folks who posted in it just because they were badmouthing her favoriting wrestler.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on July 16, 2010, 08:50:26 AM
I've seen plenty of stupidity on the Wrestlecrap forums. One of the mods there actually suspended a person's account for 2 days just because said person told him that his jokes were lame. Another instance was a female mod who locked a topic and banned the folks who posted in it just because they were badmouthing her favoriting wrestler.

Yeah that same female mod HATES former wrestler Lacey and does nothing but call her a whore all day.
WC is so stupid. Talking about womens' wrestling in a positive light and replying to topics using women wrestlers (for example: posting Bull or Dump in a thread about the best facepaint) and just being a womens' wrestling fan will get you banned because "no one cares about womens' wrestling". Meanwhile, posters were allowed to say that shimmer wrestlers looked like girls from cum fiesta.
In January I told the worst mod they have, lildude, that TNA was downplaying the KOs and he banned me, again "no they're not. there's no difference". He's not even a fan of womens' wrestlng. I think he might be the lame joke mod in question because he never adds anything of substance to any thread; just lame jokes designed to make a mockery out of the subject.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on July 17, 2010, 12:02:46 AM
wow, thanks for the advice. i'd never go to WrestleCrap forums ever. i've been to the home site but not on the forum section.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: The Juhoker on July 17, 2010, 12:52:41 AM
I've seen plenty of stupidity on the Wrestlecrap forums. One of the mods there actually suspended a person's account for 2 days just because said person told him that his jokes were lame. Another instance was a female mod who locked a topic and banned the folks who posted in it just because they were badmouthing her favoriting wrestler.

Yeah that same female mod HATES former wrestler Lacey and does nothing but call her a whore all day.
WC is so stupid. Talking about womens' wrestling in a positive light and replying to topics using women wrestlers (for example: posting Bull or Dump in a thread about the best facepaint) and just being a womens' wrestling fan will get you banned because "no one cares about womens' wrestling". Meanwhile, posters were allowed to say that shimmer wrestlers looked like girls from cum fiesta.
In January I told the worst mod they have, lildude, that TNA was downplaying the KOs and he banned me, again "no they're not. there's no difference". He's not even a fan of womens' wrestlng. I think he might be the lame joke mod in question because he never adds anything of substance to any thread; just lame jokes designed to make a mockery
out of the subject.

Exactly. The mods can do whatever they want on there but they don't seem to warn people when they're acting like complete jackasses and just let them say whatever they want and also most of the people who post there seem to blame Triple H and John Cena for every bad thing that happens in the WWE. Another thing that bugs me about the Wrestlecrap forums is that you can't talk bad about CM Punk, Bryan Danielson or any other internet darling but everybody else is an acceptable target.

Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on July 17, 2010, 08:20:29 PM
Lol, I'm actually inline with those lines of thoughts, so no problem with that. I see as many people defending Trips, Cena and Batista as I do detractors. Most of the WWE forum posters are so used to the way WWE does things they react in a negative way to fans having an opinon or fan interaction that isn't the standard hand slapping like the Cena-haters at WM.

What I find is, some people want to be anti-"IWC" just to go against the grain and go out of their way to insult Punk or Danielson (or Mickie) for being popular. And it just so happens those 2 are so against the grain of what WWE forces us to accept. The WWE boards are typical of WWE fans even on the internet, a bunch of Drew McInytre loving robots posting about how Danielson is bland and "got no reaction". There's something funny about the venom displayed towards wrestlers who aren't the typical WWE underwear model on the gas hogwash. And the backlash against Carlito for coming out and saying he was depressed. ...lame.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: The Juhoker on July 18, 2010, 12:14:50 AM
Lol, I'm actually inline with those lines of thoughts, so no problem with that. I see as many people defending Trips, Cena and Batista as I do detractors. Most of the WWE forum posters are so used to the way WWE does things they react in a negative way to fans having an opinon or fan interaction that isn't the standard hand slapping like the Cena-haters at WM.

What I find is, some people want to be anti-"IWC" just to go against the grain and go out of their way to insult Punk or Danielson (or Mickie) for being popular. And it just so happens those 2 are so against the grain of what WWE forces us to accept. The WWE boards are typical of WWE fans even on the internet, a bunch of Drew McInytre loving robots posting about how Danielson is bland and "got no reaction". There's something funny about the venom displayed towards wrestlers who aren't the typical WWE underwear model on the gas hogwash. And the backlash against Carlito for coming out and saying he was depressed. ...lame.

That's true. They love guys like Batista and Mcintyre but they don't like the people who don't look like a typical WWE wrestler. The stuff about Mickie James was what really pissed me off and they just kept making jokes about her because she supposedly looked like a horse and was supposedly fat. Well, i liked Mickie because she didn't look like the typical WWE Diva and wasn't stick thin. I also don't get them getting mad at Carlito for coming out after he was fired and saying how he felt. I agreed with a lot of the stuff Carlito said and i really want Bryan Danielson to come back because he had plenty of skill to go far and his feuds with the Miz and Michael cole were putting him on the right path.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on July 18, 2010, 01:04:34 AM
Lol, I'm actually inline with those lines of thoughts, so no problem with that. I see as many people defending Trips, Cena and Batista as I do detractors.

yes i'm one of those Cena apologists (the guy is great but the booking committee is more concerned of booking him as Hogan 2.0 and keeping the merchandise mill rolling). i've had my share of detractors not that i ever considered them as reason to stop being Cena's fan

What I find is, some people want to be anti-"IWC" just to go against the grain and go out of their way to insult Punk or Danielson (or Mickie) for being popular. And it just so happens those 2 are so against the grain of what WWE forces us to accept. The WWE boards are typical of WWE fans even on the internet, a bunch of Drew McIntyre loving robots posting about how Danielson is bland and "got no reaction". There's something funny about the venom displayed towards wrestlers who aren't the typical WWE underwear model on the gas hogwash. And the backlash against Carlito for coming out and saying he was depressed. ...lame.

i have an account at WWE messageboards that i don't use that much knowing how the admin there tolerates Cena bashing and suppresses HHH criticism. i can't tell if it's still the same thing since i've not returned there for months. and being popular is the worst reason a person could come up with to hate a person in a desperate attempt to be cool. i hate the Jonas brothers not because i'm being anti-It but i think they really suck. i hate Batista not because i wanted to be different from other Filipinos who were duped with the fallacy that he's a great wrestler but because most of the time, he sucked. i don't hate Drew McIntyre in the same way most IWC's do but i really don't like it when i'm forced to like this person just because he gets the main event/upper midcard treatment like if this is a bee colony, he's a few steps away from reigning the colony (because Sheamus is ahead of him).

on the other hand, i like Sheamus. at first it's like he's forced on us too but he's a far more interesting character than McIntyre. but with the kind of psychology he puts into angles/matches, you expect better things to come for this guy.

as for this ....
... a bunch of Drew McIntyre loving robots posting about how Danielson is bland and "got no reaction".

... they better not be too obvious as WWE employees/stockholders/whatever party that's bound to benefit from WWE stock dividends.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on July 31, 2010, 01:43:44 AM
What's the most ridiculous thing you've ever encountered on a message board/forum? It could be another poster, a thought or a question. ..I'll get the ball rolling. ..


i hope you don't mind if i include blogs here
http://chicogarcia.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/lingam-massage/#comments (http://chicogarcia.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/lingam-massage/#comments)
what is lingam massage? just read
(why don't they just call it foreplay?)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on August 04, 2010, 09:00:34 PM
LOL. *saves link*
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on August 06, 2010, 01:32:39 AM
Presenting 411mania's "Douchebag of the Week" (http://www.411mania.com/movies/columns/147895/TV-Rants-and-Raves-8.04.10.htm)
(Oh God! I've never seen anything like this *smirk)

Quote
This week, the TV Rants and Raves Douchebag of the Week goes to WWE owner Vince McMahon, for saying that pro wrestlers working for the WWE make enough money to be able to afford their own health insurance. McMahon also said that wrestlers are "independent contractors" and he doesn't know any independent contractors that don't have their own health insurance.

i was tempted to put this on "Ask a Wrestler" but knowing how lame it sounded, it obviously fitted more here.
health insurance? really? after watching Michael Moore's "Sicko", it made me think Canadian wrestlers like Edge have better medical coverage (unless you have a problem with Canadian health care).

by the way, this reminds me of why people like in my turf raise their arms in anger

on the other hand, i found this on the comments' section ($500,000 is an average wrestler's annual income?):
Quote
The average is $500,000 - which means that there are some that make $1,000,000+ and some that make $100,000-$150,000.

Plus - what insurance company would want to insure a professional wrestler. I would guess that on average, a professional wrestler with the WWE will have two surgical procedures each year (some more, some less) - these can minor or major surgeries, but any surgery STARTS at around $20,000. So right away, an insurer would be looking to $40,000 of medical costs each year. And if they have major surgery - $80k-$100k in costs would not be unexpected.

Insurance companies would not want to take on anyone unless they are able to make a profit. So let's say that wrestler's medical coverage costs $50,000/year (and this is on the low side). Add in profit and it would cost them $55,000.

Now - someone like Primo or the Uso's would be on the low end of the pay scale ($125,000/year), and they would have to pay $55,000 for their medical coverage.

If you make $50,000/year, would you be willing to pay $20,000 for medical? No - you probably pay about $1500 with the company you work for paying another $2500.

If Vince would offer all wrestlers a group medical package, they can get a discount on these costs because their costs are shared across all of the wrestlers. By splitting the risk across 50 different wrestlers, the insurance company doesn't need to make as much on each person, and their risk is diluted.

Posted By: SpankyHamm (Guest)  on August 04, 2010 at 01:23 PM
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on August 16, 2010, 04:07:38 AM
The lamest thing last week: Haters hating because they feel left out.
Also, everything Eric Bischoff said on facebook.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on August 17, 2010, 03:52:04 AM
The lamest thing last week: Haters hating because they feel left out.
Also, everything Eric Bischoff said on facebook.

... and Bischoff selling the fake Hulk Hogan account
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on August 17, 2010, 04:40:58 PM
I do remember someone saying CM Punk and KENTA are the same person... *kori
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on August 19, 2010, 06:41:21 AM
^^^ THAT KILLED ME! :D


I've been wanting to say this for a long time: whenever someone criticizes the way WWE promotes women they are immediately hit with the "women can't draw, all they can do is be eye candy" bomb. This line of thought it prevalent because of wrestling revisionist history concerning women. Women used to draw money. Lots of money. The very idea of women beating the shit out of each other and actually competing in a sport was so bizarre and enthralling it packed houses by itself. Keep in mind when Mildred Burke became the "first" official woman wrestling people were still publishing articles about how women are inferior to men and unable to perform as athletes. In a way, this kind of thinking has been intellectually refuted but it hasn't been culturally refuted and here's how: the entire reason people think women can't draw is because they like to think women are too stupid to grasp the complexities of wrestling like selling, psychology, character creation etc.,
So they rarely even try to make women into wrestlers (in North America); they're always half formed novelties.
Because of the above and the way we've been programmed to see women in wrestling since some guys figured it was better to bring in girlfriends, rats and strippers than actual women wrestlers because the former would fuck them is why no matter what a woman does on the main stage (WWE) it will always get a cold reception.
Titties are not enough to get people invested in the matches, this has been proven. But WWE doesn't want people invested in Divas matches.
But that doesn't mean women are incapable of thrilling a crowd with more than the size of their breast implants.

Someone go post this as a reply to this thread: http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2 (http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2)
reply # 28 in particular. I got banned a long time ago. And shit like that bugs the hell out of me
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on August 19, 2010, 04:14:14 PM
I've been wanting to say this for a long time: whenever someone criticizes the way WWE promotes women they are immediately hit with the "women can't draw, all they can do is be eye candy" bomb. This line of thought it prevalent because of wrestling revisionist history concerning women. Women used to draw money. Lots of money. The very idea of women beating the shit out of each other and actually competing in a sport was so bizarre and enthralling it packed houses by itself. Keep in mind when Mildred Burke became the "first" official woman wrestling people were still publishing articles about how women are inferior to men and unable to perform as athletes. In a way, this kind of thinking has been intellectually refuted but it hasn't been culturally refuted and here's how: the entire reason people think women can't draw is because they like to think women are too stupid to grasp the complexities of wrestling like selling, psychology, character creation etc.,
So they rarely even try to make women into wrestlers (in North America); they're always half formed novelties.
Because of the above and the way we've been programmed to see women in wrestling since some guys figured it was better to bring in girlfriends, rats and strippers than actual women wrestlers because the former would fuck them is why no matter what a woman does on the main stage (WWE) it will always get a cold reception.
Titties are not enough to get people invested in the matches, this has been proven. But WWE doesn't want people invested in Divas matches.
But that doesn't mean women are incapable of thrilling a crowd with more than the size of their breast implants.

Someone go post this as a reply to this thread: http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2 (http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2)
reply # 28 in particular. I got banned a long time ago. And shit like that bugs the hell out of me

People saying women (who aren't named Trish Stratus) can't draw or be huge stars is complete BS. Obviously they haven't heard of the Crush Gals, Megumi Kudo, etc. But their knowledge of women's wrestling is probably limited to the US, so therefore I'm not surprised.

I would like to post that, but it's wrestlecrap, and it probably fall on deaf ears... and I would probably get banned as soon I post that anyway.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on August 21, 2010, 01:06:09 AM

I've been wanting to say this for a long time: whenever someone criticizes the way WWE promotes women they are immediately hit with the "women can't draw, all they can do is be eye candy" bomb. This line of thought it prevalent because of wrestling revisionist history concerning women. Women used to draw money. Lots of money. The very idea of women beating the shit out of each other and actually competing in a sport was so bizarre and enthralling it packed houses by itself. Keep in mind when Mildred Burke became the "first" official woman wrestling people were still publishing articles about how women are inferior to men and unable to perform as athletes. In a way, this kind of thinking has been intellectually refuted but it hasn't been culturally refuted and here's how: the entire reason people think women can't draw is because they like to think women are too stupid to grasp the complexities of wrestling like selling, psychology, character creation etc.,
So they rarely even try to make women into wrestlers (in North America); they're always half formed novelties.
Because of the above and the way we've been programmed to see women in wrestling since some guys figured it was better to bring in girlfriends, rats and strippers than actual women wrestlers because the former would fuck them is why no matter what a woman does on the main stage (WWE) it will always get a cold reception.
Titties are not enough to get people invested in the matches, this has been proven. But WWE doesn't want people invested in Divas matches.
But that doesn't mean women are incapable of thrilling a crowd with more than the size of their breast implants.

Someone go post this as a reply to this thread: http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2 (http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2)
reply # 28 in particular. I got banned a long time ago. And shit like that bugs the hell out of me

... which is the reason i never joined that messageboard. reading alone the posts really gives me shivers. ugh! if you want to ruin your day, go there. i won't stop you.

anyway ...
http://christwire.org/2010/08/is-my-husband-gay/ (http://christwire.org/2010/08/is-my-husband-gay/)
how i wish this is just something you'll find at humor sites like CollegeHumor.com but no ...
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on August 21, 2010, 11:54:24 AM
^^ It is a major downer. Wow @ that link.

I've been wanting to say this for a long time: whenever someone criticizes the way WWE promotes women they are immediately hit with the "women can't draw, all they can do is be eye candy" bomb. This line of thought it prevalent because of wrestling revisionist history concerning women. Women used to draw money. Lots of money. The very idea of women beating the shit out of each other and actually competing in a sport was so bizarre and enthralling it packed houses by itself. Keep in mind when Mildred Burke became the "first" official woman wrestling people were still publishing articles about how women are inferior to men and unable to perform as athletes. In a way, this kind of thinking has been intellectually refuted but it hasn't been culturally refuted and here's how: the entire reason people think women can't draw is because they like to think women are too stupid to grasp the complexities of wrestling like selling, psychology, character creation etc.,
So they rarely even try to make women into wrestlers (in North America); they're always half formed novelties.
Because of the above and the way we've been programmed to see women in wrestling since some guys figured it was better to bring in girlfriends, rats and strippers than actual women wrestlers because the former would fuck them is why no matter what a woman does on the main stage (WWE) it will always get a cold reception.
Titties are not enough to get people invested in the matches, this has been proven. But WWE doesn't want people invested in Divas matches.
But that doesn't mean women are incapable of thrilling a crowd with more than the size of their breast implants.

Someone go post this as a reply to this thread: http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2 (http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=WWE&action=display&thread=303156&page=2)
reply # 28 in particular. I got banned a long time ago. And shit like that bugs the hell out of me

People saying women (who aren't named Trish Stratus) can't draw or be huge stars is complete BS. Obviously they haven't heard of the Crush Gals, Megumi Kudo, etc. But their knowledge of women's wrestling is probably limited to the US, so therefore I'm not surprised.

I would like to post that, but it's wrestlecrap, and it probably fall on deaf ears... and I would probably get banned as soon I post that anyway.

Even within the US you had women like Mlidred Burke and June Byers earning equal to the men and Burke in particular was popular in Japan. It's sad how womens' wrestling history has been so erased people don't know what they're talking about.

I've gotten banned for saying as much.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on August 29, 2010, 08:58:54 AM
All the people saying Luna "never did anything of note in her career" are so far off the mark it's not even funny. They're forgetting that if it wasn't for her selfless job of putting over that useless bag of silicone (Sable) there wouldn't have been a womens' title revival in the 90s and we wouldn't have gotten the useless parade of bimbos keeping their hands busy on lonely nights. Also, like any woman who isn't acceptable by male standards she wasn't allowed to do much and pushed over in favor of useless people like Sunny and Sable. Another thing, she had good runs all over the place when womens' wrestling was scarce and before that she was in Kevin Sullivan's army of darkness. She's had the most heat any woman has ever had at Wrestlemania.

I just love when assholes clearly don't know what the fuck they're talking about. They were too busy rubbing one out to Sable they never noticed how great Luna was. And why should they? The world doesn't work that way. The bigger, the faker the tits and the emptier the head (the less capable you are at wrestling) the more people like you.

All the more reason to smash faces in, I guess.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on September 11, 2010, 01:55:46 AM
and now for something kinky ... (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/valley-girl-brain/200911/get-kinky-it) but lame
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on October 10, 2010, 09:08:44 PM
"Husky Harris is a fat slob who should get himself in shape and look like he actually cares about his profession"

*PULLS HAIR OUT*

I'd like to see the guy who posted that say that about Husky's grandfather; Blackjack Mulligan, Stan Hansen, Terry Gordy.. ..the list goes on. I hate that wrestling has moved in this "look like an underwear model or else" direction.  

Look up Mulligan on the youtube, you won't regret it.

Also, I'm pretty damn sure Husky is in great shape. He moves like an athlete. He's more athletic than a lot of the guys who are "in shape".
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on October 11, 2010, 05:41:27 AM
Ayumi not winning the NEO titles. Now that is lame.

Someone should tweet to Bolshoi and tell her to consider booking Ayumi in JWP more.

Ayumi Kurihara: Next JWP Openweight Champion!
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on October 11, 2010, 07:06:23 AM
Ayumi not winning the NEO titles. Now that is lame.

Can someone explain what having a dead company's title would do for Ayumi?

And I'd rather for Yoneyama's run to not be cut short by Ayumi. This has been a long time coming for Yoneyama, Ayumi's got time on her side, it's not like she's spun her wheels for 10 years.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: King of Joshi on October 11, 2010, 07:16:03 AM
Ayumi not winning the NEO titles. Now that is lame.

It is the lamest. Necrophiliac booking strikes again. Even a dying company can't move things forward when they have every reason and excuse to, including the current champ retiring.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Fanboy on October 11, 2010, 07:47:31 AM
Ayumi not winning the NEO titles. Now that is lame.

Can someone explain what having a dead company's title would do for Ayumi?

And I'd rather for Yoneyama's run to not be cut short by Ayumi. This has been a long time coming for Yoneyama, Ayumi's got time on her side, it's not like she's spun her wheels for 10 years.

It's not the titles so much as the fact that there had been a build-up for Kurihara to finally get that career-defining win in a major singles match against a top-of-the-line opponent, and NEO yanked the rug from under us for no reason.  There's no reason to protect Tamura anymore (she's retiring) and putting a good youngster over on her way out would do more for her legacy in puroresu than this.

Maybe NEO can be true comedians and convince Kyoko to come back for the last show and have Tamura drop the titles to her.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on October 11, 2010, 07:59:00 AM
Ayumi not winning the NEO titles. Now that is lame.

Can someone explain what having a dead company's title would do for Ayumi?

And I'd rather for Yoneyama's run to not be cut short by Ayumi. This has been a long time coming for Yoneyama, Ayumi's got time on her side, it's not like she's spun her wheels for 10 years.

It's not the titles so much as the fact that there had been a build-up for Kurihara to finally get that career-defining win in a major singles match against a top-of-the-line opponent, and NEO yanked the rug from under us for no reason.  There's no reason to protect Tamura anymore (she's retiring) and putting a good youngster over on her way out would do more for her legacy in puroresu than this.

Maybe NEO can be true comedians and convince Kyoko to come back for the last show and have Tamura drop the titles to her.

Wouldn't it be better for Tamura's memory (and perhaps her personal feelings) to let her go out champion? She never seemed to have a big, singular career defining moment, either. Coming to prominence at exactly the wrong time in joshi and most of her defining moments are NEO moments centered around her as NEO's Ace. That's the only reason I think they're letting Tamura keep the belt, her allegiance and history with NEO.

Ayumi's young and she's getting all sorts of attention in the industry. She'll definitely shine,  there's no reason to kick an old, sick dog when she's down and take the last thing she has to give it to a girl who's going to go on to be something great.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on October 11, 2010, 07:59:26 AM
It's not the titles so much as the fact that there had been a build-up for Kurihara to finally get that career-defining win in a major singles match against a top-of-the-line opponent, and NEO yanked the rug from under us for no reason.  There's no reason to protect Tamura anymore (she's retiring) and putting a good youngster over on her way out would do more for her legacy in puroresu than this.

QFT!
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: UnstableProtagonist on October 11, 2010, 08:13:05 AM
U.P. does not approve of such lameness, nor do the following parties:

Nacchi said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/cmon_son3c.jpg)

Kayo Noumi said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/cmon_son-noumi2.jpg)

Even Kana said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/kana_cmon-son.jpg)

Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on October 11, 2010, 08:32:04 AM
U.P. does not approve of such lameness, nor do the following parties:

Nacchi said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/cmon_son3c.jpg)

Kayo Noumi said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/cmon_son-noumi2.jpg)

Even Kana said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/kana_cmon-son.jpg)



I lessthanthree you U.P.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: King of Joshi on October 11, 2010, 08:55:03 AM
It's not the titles so much as the fact that there had been a build-up for Kurihara to finally get that career-defining win in a major singles match against a top-of-the-line opponent, and NEO yanked the rug from under us for no reason.  There's no reason to protect Tamura anymore (she's retiring) and putting a good youngster over on her way out would do more for her legacy in puroresu than this.

Maybe NEO can be true comedians and convince Kyoko to come back for the last show and have Tamura drop the titles to her.

I don't understand what the point of them teaming up has been if they weren't going to put Kurihara over. This defines lame, especially with Tamura retiring anyway and that's supposed to mean losing. This one would have meant something.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on October 11, 2010, 10:07:46 AM
yeah, Koda is made of FAIL on this one. Although, I do think that TAMUKURI was born from Tamura being impressed by Ayumi during the DNH II tourny andwanting to team with her more often...them getting team gold, I think was just a knock-on effect from their popularity with the Japanese fanbase.

Still FAIL that Ayumi jobbed...hell, if they wanted to give Ayumi the rub while still keeping the belt on Tamura, they could've gone time limit at least...
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: The Juhoker on October 11, 2010, 03:10:08 PM
"Husky Harris is a fat slob who should get himself in shape and look like he actually cares about his profession"

*PULLS HAIR OUT*

I'd like to see the guy who posted that say that about Husky's grandfather; Blackjack Mulligan, Stan Hansen, Terry Gordy.. ..the list goes on. I hate that wrestling has moved in this "look like an underwear model or else" direction.  

Look up Mulligan on the youtube, you won't regret it.

Also, I'm pretty damn sure Husky is in great shape. He moves like an athlete. He's more athletic than a lot of the guys who are "in shape".

I facepalmed pretty hard at that. I think Husky harris is a really good wrestler and he is an agile big man liker Vader and Umaga but that's the Wrestlecrap forum for you. They have some pretty whacked out and downright goofy opinions of certain wrestlers.

"Unpopular opinions are wrong most of the time, and there's a good reason why they're unpopular. To elaborate further, I think the majority of unpopular opinions are just an attempt to stand out from the crowd. It's hard to find ones that come off as authentic"

I agree with this but nobody on that forum will admit that and they'll just go about saying more goofy and idiotic bullcrap thinking that they know more about wrestling than the people who actually run the companies.

Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on October 11, 2010, 03:17:15 PM
...they'll just go about saying more goofy and idiotic bullcrap thinking that they know more about wrestling than the people who actually run the companies.

Oh, but they do, don't you know?  That's why the ones running the companies are making millions while the guys who know better are still living in their parents' basement, growing out their net beards and only bathing once a week because they don't feel the need to bath unless they've sweat and they only sweat once a week when they climb that flight of stairs to get rid of the piss jugs next to their computers.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on October 11, 2010, 04:39:16 PM
Can someone explain what having a dead company's title would do for Ayumi?

And I'd rather for Yoneyama's run to not be cut short by Ayumi. This has been a long time coming for Yoneyama, Ayumi's got time on her side, it's not like she's spun her wheels for 10 years.

Like the others have said, it wasn't so much the titles that would make her, but the win over a big star like Tamura. I stated the other week that if Ayumi won, it would be a double-edged sword. NEO is a dying promotion, so most likely she wouldn't have been able defend the titles except perhaps at the final NEO show.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: UnstableProtagonist on October 11, 2010, 06:24:17 PM
Even so, it would've made perfect sense if Ayumi had actually gotten over. Considering her moderate surge in popularity throughout this year, one would think that a win against Tamura could've put her career to a higher plateau. Besides, the NEO part of the double championship belts would be benign anyway.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: King of Joshi on October 11, 2010, 07:34:43 PM
"Unpopular opinions are wrong most of the time, and there's a good reason why they're unpopular. To elaborate further, I think the majority of unpopular opinions are just an attempt to stand out from the crowd. It's hard to find ones that come off as authentic"

I agree with this but nobody on that forum will admit that and they'll just go about saying more goofy and idiotic bullcrap thinking that they know more about wrestling than the people who actually run the companies.

You shouldn't agree with that. It's a logical fallacy and there are plenty of easy an obvious examples of how wrong it is, especially in America where people are woefully ignorant about any number of things they have strong, popular opinions on. See: Evolution.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on October 13, 2010, 04:46:55 AM
U.P. does not approve of such lameness, nor do the following parties:


Even Kana said:

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y16/a2b3c4d5/kana_cmon-son.jpg)



oh my ... the Jack Nicholson from "The Shining" look, i LOVE it
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on October 13, 2010, 10:24:56 AM
Can someone explain what having a dead company's title would do for Ayumi?

And I'd rather for Yoneyama's run to not be cut short by Ayumi. This has been a long time coming for Yoneyama, Ayumi's got time on her side, it's not like she's spun her wheels for 10 years.

Like the others have said, it wasn't so much the titles that would make her, but the win over a big star like Tamura. I stated the other week that if Ayumi won, it would be a double-edged sword. NEO is a dying promotion, so most likely she wouldn't have been able defend the titles except perhaps at the final NEO show.

I still really don't think Ayumi needs it. No one else got to take a picture with Togi Makabe. I know she's the chosen and all that but still. ..I'd say she's pretty solidified. She's a cute, face girl working for S-Ovation. She's already been to America and Mexico (where I head she's "big/popular"). She'll be fine. Why does she need the dead title from a dead company that didn't really mean all that much to joshi anyway?

Besides that, Tamura NEVER put anyone over during her career. Why expect it, now?
If you haven't SEEN the match, how do you know she "jobbed". Loosing is not the same as jobbing? I used to think everyone here was pretty smart about it but this Ayumi stuff reminds me that when favorites are involved any loss automatically becomes a job. Does no one see the validity in giving an old dog (no disrespect to Tamura but I always feel sorry for women who go down with the ship. They didn't really have a choice. I remember when Tamura was popular but there's no demand for her anymore while there's plenty of demand for Ayumi and friends.) a go-home happy shot at all? Especially when the company is dead and buried. It's not like someone has to make the new kids look good or else the company will die.
I'd cry if they asked me to give my title up to some new kid who's going to go on to win many more when I'm about to retire. I'd cry and then I'd stiff the shit out of her if she's getting a win that's going to kick me when I'm down, especially if I have the stoic mindset of Tamura. It's not like her "putting her over" is going to do Ayumi any real good, anyway.

Anyway, this thread is not the Ayumi-must-win=even-though-I'm-across-the-world show ...that's what the Anon section is for. Keep this thread anecdotal.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on October 13, 2010, 04:31:03 PM
Besides that, Tamura NEVER put anyone over during her career. Why expect it, now?
If you haven't SEEN the match, how do you know she "jobbed". Loosing is not the same as jobbing? I used to think everyone here was pretty smart about it but this Ayumi stuff reminds me that when favorites are involved any loss automatically becomes a job.

I never said Ayumi jobbed. Jobbing is getting squashed in under 10 minutes with getting little to no offense in. I do know the difference. I was a bit high on Ayumi when I originally said that her not winning was lame, so I'll admit that I overlooked the other aspects of the outcome of the match. Your probably right about Ayumi not needing a big title right away.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: King of Joshi on October 13, 2010, 07:30:22 PM
I never said Ayumi jobbed. Jobbing is getting squashed in under 10 minutes with getting little to no offense in. I do know the difference. I was a bit high on Ayumi when I originally said that her not winning was lame, so I'll admit that I overlooked the other aspects of the outcome of the match. Your probably right about Ayumi not needing a big title right away.

I'm not an Ayumi superfan, but it's a pretty objectively dumb move and wasted opportunity. Such is Joshi. But you'd think they'd at least have figured out how to handle retirements properly by now with so many.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 04, 2010, 04:04:09 PM
"William Regal is overrated"

Fuck you, kid. Fuck you.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on November 04, 2010, 04:58:08 PM
"William Regal is overrated"

Fuck you, kid. Fuck you.

Lolwut? If anything he's underrated.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 04, 2010, 05:29:31 PM
"William Regal is overrated"

Fuck you, kid. Fuck you.

Lolwut? If anything he's underrated.

Exactly, he can: wrestle and work. He's a great technician, he can talk, he can get over even if he's being buried. I don't understand what's so hard to "get" about William Regal.

He's also a wicked man when he gets going.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: UnstableProtagonist on November 04, 2010, 08:11:15 PM
"He (Santino) was brutalized last week by YOU-MANGA (Umaga)!!"
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 04, 2010, 11:19:53 PM
YOU-Manga and Triple Haitch! Man, that was a good commissioner/GM/whatever they want to call it run.

Also this was funny:
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/4375/williamregal.gif)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on November 06, 2010, 02:29:40 AM
i just turned someone down online.

the chat goes

him: here's my latest photo (activates photo sharing at YM)
me: wow ... you look kinda old
him: i'm not kinda old ... i AM old. i'm already in my 50's
me: (uncomfy) actually you're the same age as that of my mom.
him: well, if you remember my profile at FFF (the dating onsite where i'm currently registered), my age says 57. nobody's stopping people not even age from becoming friends right?
me: (it took me awhile to answer that)
him: if you're uncomfortable being friends with me, well, it's okay if you want to stop the chat.
me: (still not answering)
him: it was nice meeting you though. have a nice day. bye.
me: bye.
him: (logged out)

i guess i still have difficulty turning somebody down. i think i'm not yet that impolite to do so (no matter how icky the situation seemed to be).
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 06, 2010, 12:56:48 PM
lol, old guy ftw.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Queen of Black Roses on November 07, 2010, 09:17:59 PM
"William Regal is overrated"

Fuck you, kid. Fuck you.

Um...Wow. I agree with you about The Gentleman Brawler being underrated. He plays the villain well, can get a crowd riled up and can transistion beautifully from brawling to technical wrestling. Many young wrestlers could take notes from him on technique and promo skills.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 07, 2010, 10:19:36 PM
I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on November 07, 2010, 11:37:03 PM
I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".

Fact: If women didn't have reproductive organs the human race would not exist.

Sometimes I wish the internet wasn't so "closed off", if you know what I mean. It's ridiculous what people can get away with saying on the internet. Someone needs to spit on him.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 07, 2010, 11:38:52 PM
I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".

Fact: If women didn't have reproductive organs the human race would not exist.

Sometimes I wish the internet wasn't so "closed off", if you know what I mean. It's ridiculous what people can get away with saying on the internet. Someone needs to spit on him.

I ran into him on youtube. He's a gangsta rap wannabe. It's hilarious. I'm really going to have to fuck with him, now. It's just too good a social experiment to pass up. I've met guys just like him face to face.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: TasotheGreek on November 08, 2010, 01:01:12 PM
i just turned someone down online.

the chat goes

him: here's my latest photo (activates photo sharing at YM)
me: wow ... you look kinda old
him: i'm not kinda old ... i AM old. i'm already in my 50's
me: (uncomfy) actually you're the same age as that of my mom.
him: well, if you remember my profile at FFF (the dating onsite where i'm currently registered), my age says 57. nobody's stopping people not even age from becoming friends right?
me: (it took me awhile to answer that)
him: if you're uncomfortable being friends with me, well, it's okay if you want to stop the chat.
me: (still not answering)
him: it was nice meeting you though. have a nice day. bye.
me: bye.
him: (logged out)

i guess i still have difficulty turning somebody down. i think i'm not yet that impolite to do so (no matter how icky the situation seemed to be).

Sorry, Im old (41), and I think you were sorta lame.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 08, 2010, 04:45:02 PM

Sorry, Im old (41), and I think you were sorta lame.

Not every girl is experienced and knows how to say "no". The idea of dating a man closer to their father's age is scary/gross to some. That's not unusual, what's "lame" about that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Part 2 of replying to a youtube troll:

Quote
Who cares if your female reproductive organ stretches out you stupid bitch. You bleed for 5 days every month, making women even more useless. How many women are in the top 10 highest IQs? LMFAO. Know your role in life, it's the kitchen serving the breadwinner.

Quote
lol dumb cunt yeah you keep listing things you are born with. What do women accomplish in life? Nothing. You are the secretary to the (boss)man. You are the ho to the pimp. You are the housewife who stays home and watches the children, lmfao. What is the average salary of a women? LOL again your best highest paying profession is a hooker.Because all women are good for is female reproductive organ. By the way men don't eat out ugly women, but all women must give head. You are here to please your man.

Look at his youtube page: http://www.youtube.com/user/OneBloodOneGame (http://www.youtube.com/user/OneBloodOneGame)

 *haha


Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on November 08, 2010, 06:24:02 PM
I honestly don't why people bother trolling. Most people do it for kicks, and half of them probably agree with you.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 08, 2010, 07:39:30 PM
Probably. He also seems pretty stupid so there's always that.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: TasotheGreek on November 08, 2010, 07:41:57 PM

Sorry, Im old (41), and I think you were sorta lame.

Not every girl is experienced and knows how to say "no". The idea of dating a man closer to their father's age is scary/gross to some. That's not unusual, what's "lame" about that?
-

I understand, I feel bad for the guy. What's lame is, no offense to anyone here or Coffee(?) original poster, but over the net how hard is it to say. "Sorry, I don't date guys over ___." I dunno, like I said, feel the ageism when you hit the big 4-0. Or 3-0, or whatever age ya'll think people are too old.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 08, 2010, 07:52:27 PM
She probably didn't know and then didn't know how to get out of it w/o being rude. It was awkward.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 08, 2010, 08:34:14 PM
I don't consider age but a lot of young girls are wary of it.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on November 09, 2010, 04:37:30 AM

Sorry, Im old (41), and I think you were sorta lame.


I understand, I feel bad for the guy. What's lame is, no offense to anyone here or Coffee(?) original poster, but over the net how hard is it to say. "Sorry, I don't date guys over ___." I dunno, like I said, feel the ageism when you hit the big 4-0. Or 3-0, or whatever age ya'll think people are too old.

i may be occasionally bitchy but that's one thing that's missing on the net lately - politeness. all the times that i've been rude, i regret that and try my best not to do it again. heck, i've been banned from this messageboard once for forgetting how to be polite and mannered that i tend to take that attitude even in other messageboards (or dating sites for that matter). i know the guy was lame but i ended up being lame too. i just took advantage of the fact that i can get out of the rut without being rude.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: TasotheGreek on November 13, 2010, 10:22:39 PM

Sorry, Im old (41), and I think you were sorta lame.


I understand, I feel bad for the guy. What's lame is, no offense to anyone here or Coffee(?) original poster, but over the net how hard is it to say. "Sorry, I don't date guys over ___." I dunno, like I said, feel the ageism when you hit the big 4-0. Or 3-0, or whatever age ya'll think people are too old.

i may be occasionally bitchy but that's one thing that's missing on the net lately - politeness. all the times that i've been rude, i regret that and try my best not to do it again. heck, i've been banned from this messageboard once for forgetting how to be polite and mannered that i tend to take that attitude even in other messageboards (or dating sites for that matter). i know the guy was lame but i ended up being lame too. i just took advantage of the fact that i can get out of the rut without being rude.

its no biggie, my fault, its just one of those things. neither you or the guy was lame, just looks like like an awkward situation, your talking to some dude and suddenly you find out he's an old dude. Same if I was talking to a girl and find out she's under 18 or 21, whatever is acceptably creepy to the individual. My gf is 26 so I date younger women, not a big deal, the age difference is barely noticeable.

You are not lame, sorry.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on November 15, 2010, 10:16:09 PM

its no biggie, my fault, its just one of those things. neither you or the guy was lame, just looks like like an awkward situation, your talking to some dude and suddenly you find out he's an old dude. Same if I was talking to a girl and find out she's under 18 or 21, whatever is acceptably creepy to the individual. My gf is 26 so I date younger women, not a big deal, the age difference is barely noticeable.

You are not lame, sorry.

it's okay. it really happens. i still attract guys online that are too old for me (it makes me think i'm a magnet for men too old for me)

anyway, back to things we find lame.

i remember a session in Philippine Congress that at the heat of the argument this happened:

congressman: this is stupid!!!
sergeant-at-arms: the word "stupid" is not allowed in the halls of congress.
congressman: okay (trying to recompose himself while finding a better word) ... this is VACUOUS!

(i can't believe the word "stupid" is banned)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: !CUTY¡ on November 16, 2010, 06:39:06 PM
Coffee, I have to say that was pretty sad to just leave him hanging like that. There's nothing wrong with just being friends or random chat partner, unless you have an age limit for friends too.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on November 17, 2010, 03:40:17 AM
Coffee, I have to say that was pretty sad to just leave him hanging like that. There's nothing wrong with just being friends or random chat partner, unless you have an age limit for friends too.

i've set age limits on my profile (at said site) yet men aged 50 or more still send me messages (worse, they don't reveal their real ages at times)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Queen of Black Roses on November 17, 2010, 05:02:29 PM
I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".

Geez. What a loser this guy is. Very misogynistic and an asshole.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on November 17, 2010, 05:05:51 PM
I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".

Geez. What a loser this guy is. Very misogynistic and an asshole.

He keeps replying to me. He's very boring and uncreative with his misogyny so I'm done trolling him but I am going to take screencaps and find some info on him. Just seems like he's mad at his mom.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Queen of Black Roses on November 17, 2010, 05:20:43 PM
I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".

Geez. What a loser this guy is. Very misogynistic and an asshole.

He keeps replying to me. He's very boring and uncreative with his misogyny so I'm done trolling him but I am going to take screencaps and find some info on him. Just seems like he's mad at his mom.

Ok. Yeah, from what i've read he looks to be in the "men are stronger and superior to women" school of thought. Known a lot of people like this.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on November 18, 2010, 05:00:58 AM

I wonder what woman has had sex with this piece of shit:

Quote
Those are things you are born with. How many women are in the top 100 richest people on earth(Let alone the top 10)? What have women invented that can compare to what men have created? Women are not better at anything in life, get over it. Your boss will always be a man, whether at work or your husband.

LOL muscle talk, you probably need a man to open a jar of pickles for your weak ass. IF you women didn't have female reproductive organ you would be the slave species.(Much more then you already are)

He's right, though. Women are the "slave species".

Vamp, just no-sell him. paying attention to him would only make him feel even superior
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on December 11, 2010, 02:24:43 AM
i've met douchebags ... but not THIS bad
The Douchiest Phone Message In History (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwjXxEKRmu0#)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on December 23, 2010, 03:50:19 PM
From this guy (http://swwa-animaniac.blogspot.com/):

Quote
It's women's wrestling.

Women's wrestling really has no business on TV. It's for the guys, that's it.

Should say American women's wrestling on TV that is. The only time I got into women's wrestling (for the wrestling heh) was when the WWE had "the Joshi revolution."

*laughs hysterically* This is also the same guy who said Low Ki doesn't have any personality. He also has a nWo avatar (http://realwrestlecrap.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=viewprofile&user=ani).
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on December 23, 2010, 04:34:39 PM
If he enjoyed the AJW girls working in WWF he should watch more Joshi then. I wouldn't say he's 100% sexist.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on December 23, 2010, 05:17:56 PM
I wouldn't, either but what he said was so BROAD and lame and yeah, to say "it's for the men, that's it" is a little bit sexist even if he was just referring to the WWE.

I think it's sexist because it's a definitive statement based on keeping the same structure instead of possibly allowing those that are talented make a difference. That's awfully lame to me. It's like saying even if a few American women are good they shouldn't be on American TV anyway because it should always be only about the men as if women have nothing to offer and are a waste.

Sadly, this is the default perspective of the wrestling majority. Either that or titties.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on December 23, 2010, 09:33:32 PM
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150498391329 (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150498391329)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on January 31, 2011, 02:29:05 AM
Quote
I personally find call-girl/prostitute to be way better than regular women. They are just so attractive, so willing, and know how to please men; whereas the regular women are just pale in comparison..

 *kori... I just don't know what to say. Words can't describe how sad that person is. But part of me says it's a troll.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on February 03, 2011, 07:10:01 AM
Quote
I personally find call-girl/prostitute to be way better than regular women. They are just so attractive, so willing, and know how to please men; whereas the regular women are just pale in comparison..

 *kori... I just don't know what to say. Words can't describe how sad that person is. But part of me says it's a troll.

trying talking to that person again after he gets chronic gonorrhea and i wonder if he can still say the same thing
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 03, 2011, 12:21:49 PM
Quote
I personally find call-girl/prostitute to be way better than regular women. They are just so attractive, so willing, and know how to please men; whereas the regular women are just pale in comparison..

 *kori... I just don't know what to say. Words can't describe how sad that person is. But part of me says it's a troll.

Eh, he has a point. "Regular" girls are way too uptight about pleasing men and sex in general. A lot of men like the "clear deal" prostitutes offer.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: UnstableProtagonist on February 03, 2011, 07:47:14 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S_fojgrtPA

I watched this and wonder: Is there any reason why the media likes to discredit the positive image of the black man while simultaneously giving us a bombardment of stereotypical caricatures? Please answer.

Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 03, 2011, 09:11:46 PM

FAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL TRAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!

Just any one of the attacks on CM Punk.
http://twitter.com/CMPUNK (http://twitter.com/CMPUNK)

Particularly this gem:
“@Chrisgarland1: @CMPunk its faeces, dumdum” This is America, not a prison colony. Go away.

Tremendous isn't a strong enough word. I've been reading this shit all day.

Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: saipuro on February 04, 2011, 12:33:29 AM
I watched this and wonder: Is there any reason why the media likes to discredit the positive image of the black man while simultaneously giving us a bombardment of stereotypical caricatures? Please answer.

Being a white male, if I saw this video when I was still living in Canada I would have called bullshit, saying that the author is deflecting responsibility by implying a racist conspiracy rather than urging young black men to take it upon themselves to watch their own conduct.  However, after living as a visible minority in Japan I'm a little more open to the idea of such a conspiracy being true.  Not that I'm saying the experience of being a white male in Japan is in any way comparable to being a black American male; for one, moving here was my choice and because I'm not a citizen with stakes in Japan I can leave anytime I want.  But there is racism here, subtle and not-so-subtle, that makes me consider the more insidious forms of racism that might exist in Canada which I never encountered because I'm not considered a minority there.  It's funny how people who honestly don't consider themselves racist can often be some of the worst perpetrators without realizing it.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 04, 2011, 12:39:43 AM
I watched this and wonder: Is there any reason why the media likes to discredit the positive image of the black man while simultaneously giving us a bombardment of stereotypical caricatures? Please answer.

Being a white male, if I saw this video when I was still living in Canada I would have called bullshit, saying that the author is deflecting responsibility by implying a racist conspiracy rather than urging young black men to take it upon themselves to watch their own conduct.  However, after living as a visible minority in Japan I'm a little more open to the idea of such a conspiracy being true.  Not that I'm saying the experience of being a white male in Japan is in any way comparable to being a black American male; for one, moving here was my choice and because I'm not a citizen with stakes in Japan I can leave anytime I want.  But there is racism here, subtle and not-so-subtle, that makes me consider the more insidious forms of racism that might exist in Canada which I never encountered because I'm not considered a minority there.  It's funny how people who honestly don't consider themselves racist can often be some of the worst perpetrators without realizing it.

EXALT~!
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Evan Bourne on February 10, 2011, 10:51:58 PM
(http://i56.tinypic.com/2m6o9ck.jpg)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on February 11, 2011, 04:50:13 AM
(http://i56.tinypic.com/2m6o9ck.jpg)

 *kori

I fucking hate people.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Fanboy on February 11, 2011, 05:13:09 AM
(http://i56.tinypic.com/2m6o9ck.jpg)

 *kori

I fucking hate people.

Maybe Quackenbush can find some jobber and give him a "Miami Toyota" gimmick for the first round match against Manami.  I'd LOL.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 11, 2011, 07:55:08 AM
lol, Miami Toyota. ...I hope that person is going by ear.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 11, 2011, 09:29:38 AM

 *kori

I fucking hate people.

Stop hanging around those prejudiced, woman hating homophobes at SSS and I guarantee you'll feel a lot better about humanity.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on February 12, 2011, 12:14:53 AM

 *kori

I fucking hate people.

Stop hanging around those prejudiced, woman hating homophobes at SSS and I guarantee you'll feel a lot better about humanity.

Unlikely.  I blame my working at WalMart for my hatred of those that try to pass themselves off as humanity.  Human beings are still alright with me, it's people that I hate.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 12, 2011, 12:17:34 AM
Oh yes, any job dealing with the public at large will do that to you. You gotta specialize, man.

I'm a nihilistic uber bitch but I never had that overall experience when I worked in fast food or retail. But I was called a "cocktail waitress" by some co-workers. Being that way helps to negate the shittiness of humanity.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Evan Bourne on February 23, 2011, 12:37:26 AM
(http://i56.tinypic.com/2qu4zu0.jpg)

NO! SNOOKI! NO!
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on February 25, 2011, 04:54:42 PM
IF Snooki (or Vivica A. Fox or Amber Rose for that matter. ...dayum!) were into chicks I'd try my damnedest to make her. I mean like. ....especially Vivica and Amber .. ...
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: JoshiFanficz on March 13, 2011, 04:38:01 AM
WARNING: Extremely heartless, bigoted pieces of shit are found in link below. They are not trolls, I repeat, they are not trolls. Read at your own risk.

http://i.imgur.com/rGpqY.jpg (http://i.imgur.com/rGpqY.jpg)
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Coffee on March 28, 2011, 06:22:22 AM
2 words = Ryan Murphy (http://www.buddytv.com/articles/glee/glee-feud-is-ryan-murphy-a-fin-39726.aspx)

i may be a fan of Glee but at some point, NOT getting featured in Glee might have been a badge of honor
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on May 20, 2011, 06:00:51 PM
Keep deleting this. Which for some reason is the most offensive post ever despite Larmore telling me to eat a dick like it's a big deal (thing). I snap off dicks like slim jims for breakfast. Men are fragile. Keep deleting this (AND NOTHING ELSE FROM THE FLAME WAR), I'll keep posting it.

Quote from: LARMORE
I've raised hell around here for 5 years, and raised hell in real life for 4 times that time. You've been here for 5 minutes. Eat a dick, mother fucker.

No.
If I do eat a dick, I'll make sure it's yours.
The fact that you think that's a powerful insult belies how much you rely on your dick. that thing could be cut off and tossed in a cornfield and then you'd be nothing. Even less than a dick.

It lives, bitch. Deal with it.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Eivion on May 20, 2011, 06:06:28 PM
I humbly request a mod to delete this and the above post as there is no reason for someone to be taking a feud from another board to this one.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on May 20, 2011, 06:11:03 PM
I humbly request a mod to delete this and the above post as there is no reason for someone to be taking a feud from another board to this one.

Don't get why you deleted THAT and nothing else. Fuck you and your buddies. You're all a bunch of assholes. Those fuckers can bait me all they like but you delete MY response and not the post that caused it. Fuck you. Fuck you and fuck your friends.

I have the right to defend myself and have my angry childish response heard right along with theirs.

Also, that's what THIS FUCKING THREAD IS FOR!!!! Read the first post, it's about lameness from other sites. Just because you don't want to see what obviously offends you more than other insults doesn't mean it can't be posted.

Fuck you can't be posted enough.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: 孤星 on May 20, 2011, 06:14:15 PM

 *kori

I fucking hate people.

Stop hanging around those prejudiced, woman hating homophobes at SSS and I guarantee you'll feel a lot better about humanity.

Should have taken this advice long ago.
Title: Re: A tribute to lameness
Post by: Sakebito_ONI on May 22, 2011, 01:03:46 PM
ok...it's out of your system now, yes?  Anything further gets deleted.

Damn, I have been amiss in doing my job over here, haven't I?